The International Review of Public Policy (IRPP) is an inclusive and integrative open access journal, free to its authors and readers. IRPP is the flagship journal of the most important world-wide association for public policy in the social sciences, the International Public Policy Association (IPPA). Our journal is dedicated to advance knowledge about public policy in different sectors, countries and regions of the world. We accept submissions with a word-limit of 10,000 words, including references, footnotes, tables and graphs.
The journal hosts contributions on theories of the policy process, empirical tests of models, agenda-setting, decisions, policy instruments policy types, policy change, policy implementation, evaluation & appraisal, and a host of other social-scientific issues revolving around public policy. IRPP publishes both comparative studies and single case studies.
Methodologically, it is completely open to individual methods (such as experiments, statistics, qualitative and interpretive methods) as well as to mixed-methods contributions. The IRPP does not discriminate against any ontological presupposition. An important aim of the journal is to publish research that has high translation value – by this, we mean policy research that makes a broad range of findings available to policy-makers, civil society organizations, pressure groups and citizens concerned about policy issues.
The IRPP is inclusive and integrative:
Inclusive: Public policy is a diverse field. The IRPP reflects this diversity by supporting the broadest array of approaches. We welcome contributions that address public policy issues from different disciplinary traditions, empirical and theoretical approaches, methodologies that reflect different ontological and epistemological assumptions.
Integrative: The IRPP aims to be integrative by building bridges, making connections between different methodologies, and developing a common language between scholars. We also welcome contributions that make their research and ideas accessible to audiences different from academics.
In seeking to translate these two ideals into practice, IRPP does not discriminate against any ontological presupposition. All disciplines contributing to public policy are welcome, such as, to mention a few, ethnography, economics, political science, psychology, socio-legal studies and sociology.
The journal does not accept political/policy commentary, explanations of legislation and court decisions, and personal opinions.
All submissions go through rigorous double-blind peer review. Submissions to the journal undergo an initial editorial screening and, when a submission is considered appropriate, it is reviewed by at least two referees. The submission process is already open. The IRPP will also soon be launching an open peer review process for interested authors.
In addition to regular submissions, the journal will publish a Forum Section on debates and controversies about public policy studies.IRPP will publish four issues by year with 4 to 8 articles for each issue.
For further information, please contact us at the following address: firstname.lastname@example.org
"As editors of IRPP, we know it is impossible to carry on with business as usual, and it would not be fair. We respect all positions in the debate on how much the editorial process of academic journals should change, but our position is to accept new submissions, carry on with the editorial process, and publish the issues of the IRPP following our schedule. With these important caveats: that we acknowledge that our priority must be to prioritize our health and help families and communities, not to review manuscript; that we will turn off all automatic reminders; that our office will listen to all authors and reviewers who are in particular circumstances and need to alter the normal flow of submissions-reviews-
Claudio M. Radaelli, IRPP Chief-Editor
Christopher M. Weible and Tanya Heikkila
Connecting Cognitive and Behavioral Characteristics of Policy Conflict in Oil and Gas Politics
Richard Shaw and Chris Eichbaum
From ménage à trois back to pas de deux? Ministerial advisers, civil servants and the contest of policy ideas
Mélanie De Winter
Reshaping health care governance using pilot projects as public policy implementation instruments
The case of integrated care pilot projects for chronic patients in Belgium
Fulya Apaydin and Jacint Jordana
Varying Power Configurations and the Accountability of Independent Regulatory Agencies
Piyapong Boossabong and Pobsook Chamchong
Coping with COVID-19 in a non-democratic system: Policy lessons from Thailand’s centralised government